Author Archives: Suraj Sood

ਅਣਜਾਣ's avatar

About Suraj Sood

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AHXJ_oRZoKHgkqY8Tmso-rU-7S-N9_i3k7CPEiYh23Q/edit?usp=sharing aham manovignyanasya ph.d. yah bruhat svapnam pashyati! mam anyebhyah samajikamadhyamaprofilebhyah mam vishaye adhikam sangrahitum shakyate.

Tai (Digimon) and Darrow (Red Rising)

Leave a reply

At the end of Digimon: Tri, leader of the “DigiDestined” Tai shares his doubts about the value of fighting with his best friend, Matt. In the third book of Pierce Brown’s Red Rising series–Morning Star–protagonist Darrow faces similar doubts as he finds himself fighting his friend, Sevro.

It is natural for characters like Tai and Darrow to question the worth of struggling. Both of these characters do so prior to the climaxes of their respective stories. One must contemplate what is worth fighting for, especially so close to the end.

But, the end beckons all worthy heroes. They cannot run! They must plod on ahead and overcome doubt in favor of achieving a peaceful end. Tai and Darrow both had to end their respective battles to move into more promising futures.

Maslow and Scott Pilgrim

Leave a reply

Scott Pilgrim fights Gideon for love (Ramona Flowers), then for self-respect.

How does he reach the next level on Maslow’s pyramid and attain self-actualization?

After conquering Gideon, Scott must fight Nega Scott. This is the battle to confront and overcome his shadow.

Ultimately, Scott is successful in befriending his dark self. Having done so, he achieves Jungian individuation, integrating the two sides of his being.

Able to move forward with the woman of his dreams, Scott becomes a self-actualized pilgrim!

A middle way psychology

Leave a reply

What would this look like? To start, it would transcend psychology’s various dichotomies. These include individualism-collectivism.

Individualism is about “me” or “you”, while collectivism is about “we”/”us”. A prized value for individualism is independence; for collectivism, dependence and interdependence.

We might look to the example of assertiveness for inspiration. Assertiveness is the middle trait between passivity and aggression. Assertiveness is the ideal balance of passiveness and aggression: the assertive person is confident yet respectful.

To resolve individualism-collectivism, their middle must be clarified. What lies between these two is our desired cultural style: “indivectivism” or “collectividualism”. The question, then, is what is between you or I and we/us!

What is a psychological person?

Leave a reply

Maybe more aptly: who are they?

The psychological person is so necessarily by their being embedded in society among other, conscious agents.

As both conscious and societal, the psychological person has the following attributes:

  • They have a mind.
  • They engage in behaviors.
  • They have a distinct personality.
  • They respond to situations.
  • They experience.
  • They sense and perceive.
  • They think, feel, and motivate.
  • They pay attention.
  • They recall and foresee.
  • They learn.

What might this mean for the person who may not have a personality or general life situation? What if they don’t think, feel, or motivate? Surely, they must experience as a conscious being. Further, personhood has been granted according to societal status over the centuries. Societal, conscious personage is a keenly biosocial label. (If someone ceases to be alive medically, they are no longer technically a “person”.)

The psychological person is biosocial! Another way to say this is that people are biopsychosocial. Some may be more or less psychological than others in certain respects…