Warning: Mature content ahead.
Had a nice idea!
Sartre and Maslow both favor non-possessiveness. Sartre’s point is more philosophical: We cannot, as a matter of ontological fact, “possess” the Other. The prime example is in romantic love–particularly, in the consensual sexual (“consexual”) act.
During “consex” (obviously, consensual sex…), we might gaze upon the other with desire for their flesh. Uh…
…let’s desexualize this. “Deconsexualize”?
Maslow believed self-actualizing people do not seek to possess their romantic Other*.
When we put Sartre and Maslow together in this con
stext, we neither can nor should possess another whose presence we enjoy and desire.
*My subjective interpretation of Maslow’s actual view.